Our latest episode of Parenting in the Screen Age, released yesterday, features interviews with college students about how they’re navigating the explosion of AI tools like ChatGPT in their academic lives. I wanted to dive into the ethical lines they’re drawing, what they will and won’t use ChatGPT for.
The rise of AI is undeniably one of the most transformative forces of our time, and its impact on young people’s education is a topic of critical importance.
Speaking personally, if large language models had existed when I was a student, I would have found it incredibly complicated and uncomfortable to decide when it was okay to use them for schoolwork and when it wasn’t. Humans are influenced by incentives, and let’s be honest: there are plenty of incentives to take shortcuts with assignments.
I have deep empathy for students today. This new reality can really mess with their minds as they try to figure out when and how to use these tools, and when not to.
In today’s blog, I’m focusing on just one of the students I interviewed in the Podcast. This college student shared a particularly challenging experience: getting flagged for AI cheating on a paper she had written entirely on her own.
But first…
Learn more about showing our movies in your school or community!
Join Screenagers filmmaker Delaney Ruston MD for our latest Podcast
Learn more about our Screen-Free Sleep campaign at the website!
Our movie made for parents and educators of younger kids
Learn more about showing our movies in your school or community!
Register your interest in bringing our new movie to your school or community
ChatGPT launched in November 2022, and shortly after, a wave of AI-detection tools emerged to assess whether a student’s work was AI-generated. Some examples include Originality.AI, and Turnitin AI, and GPTZero, which college student Edward Tian created during his undergraduate winter break… that’s a productive “break”!
But what do we even call what these tools are detecting? Are we talking about plagiarism? That’s part of a big, ongoing debate.
Many schools do classify it as plagiarism when students submit AI-generated content and claim it as their own.
Plagiarism is typically defined as copying someone else’s work without credit. So, is using sentences created by a large language model plagiarism?
What if a student uses AI for editing and it creates new sentences? Is that plagiarism?
Another term being used is “AI misconduct,” which involves misrepresenting something generated by a large language model as one’s original work.
The Council of Writing Program Administrators has established guidelines on plagiarism, but it’s clear they must now determine whether AI-related misrepresentation warrants its own distinct category.
It is an interesting and important discussion to have with our kids.
Now, on to the student who had the scare in this week’s Parenting in the Screen Age podcast episode.
“I submitted a 20-page research paper I’d worked so hard on,” she told me. “Then I got this email saying it had been flagged for inappropriate AI usage. My heart just dropped.”
The irony? She hadn’t used ChatGPT to write the paper. The only thing she mentioned having recently used it for was asking for help understanding a complex topic, flow cytometry, from a set of confusing slides.
“I showed up at my teacher’s office freaking out. I was like, ‘Am I going to get kicked out of school?’ It was honestly terrifying.”
Her teacher explained that an AI detection tool had flagged the paper, but with low confidence. Still, that was enough to trigger an investigation. What ultimately cleared her name? The version history in Google Docs.
“We went through the doc together, and my teacher could see all the edits, the rewording, the sentence changes. She finally said, ‘Okay, I can clearly tell you wrote this.’”
The emotional toll, however, was real.
“It was probably the scariest experience I’ve had in school. I know I didn’t cheat, but suddenly I felt like I was on trial. Ever since, I’ve backed off from using any AI at all.”
Her story reminds us that while AI can be a powerful tool, its presence in education also raises serious questions about fairness, trust, and proof of authorship. It shows just how important it is for educators, parents, and students to have open conversations about how these tools are being used and misused.
1. What term do we think is best to use regarding using ChatGPT in an authorized way in school?
2. Have you or a friend been flagged for having “suspected AI use?
3. What did you think of the student's story and how fearful she felt?
4. What ways are you thinking about using and not using a program like ChatGPT in school?
You can listen to the episode wherever you get your podcasts including these links:
Learn more about showing our movies in your school or community!
Join Screenagers filmmaker Delaney Ruston MD for our latest Podcast
Learn more about our Screen-Free Sleep campaign at the website!
Our movie made for parents and educators of younger kids
Join Screenagers filmmaker Delaney Ruston MD for our latest Podcast
Register your interest in bringing our new movie to your school or community
Be sure to subscribe to our YouTube Channel! We add new videos regularly and you'll find over 100 videos covering parenting advice, guidance, podcasts, movie clips and more. Here's our most recent:
As we’re about to celebrate 10 years of Screenagers, we want to hear what’s been most helpful and what you’d like to see next.
Please click here to share your thoughts with us in our community survey. It only takes 5–10 minutes, and everyone who completes it will be entered to win one of five $50 Amazon vouchers.
Our latest episode of Parenting in the Screen Age, released yesterday, features interviews with college students about how they’re navigating the explosion of AI tools like ChatGPT in their academic lives. I wanted to dive into the ethical lines they’re drawing, what they will and won’t use ChatGPT for.
The rise of AI is undeniably one of the most transformative forces of our time, and its impact on young people’s education is a topic of critical importance.
Speaking personally, if large language models had existed when I was a student, I would have found it incredibly complicated and uncomfortable to decide when it was okay to use them for schoolwork and when it wasn’t. Humans are influenced by incentives, and let’s be honest: there are plenty of incentives to take shortcuts with assignments.
I have deep empathy for students today. This new reality can really mess with their minds as they try to figure out when and how to use these tools, and when not to.
In today’s blog, I’m focusing on just one of the students I interviewed in the Podcast. This college student shared a particularly challenging experience: getting flagged for AI cheating on a paper she had written entirely on her own.
But first…
ChatGPT launched in November 2022, and shortly after, a wave of AI-detection tools emerged to assess whether a student’s work was AI-generated. Some examples include Originality.AI, and Turnitin AI, and GPTZero, which college student Edward Tian created during his undergraduate winter break… that’s a productive “break”!
But what do we even call what these tools are detecting? Are we talking about plagiarism? That’s part of a big, ongoing debate.
Many schools do classify it as plagiarism when students submit AI-generated content and claim it as their own.
Plagiarism is typically defined as copying someone else’s work without credit. So, is using sentences created by a large language model plagiarism?
What if a student uses AI for editing and it creates new sentences? Is that plagiarism?
Another term being used is “AI misconduct,” which involves misrepresenting something generated by a large language model as one’s original work.
The Council of Writing Program Administrators has established guidelines on plagiarism, but it’s clear they must now determine whether AI-related misrepresentation warrants its own distinct category.
It is an interesting and important discussion to have with our kids.
Now, on to the student who had the scare in this week’s Parenting in the Screen Age podcast episode.
“I submitted a 20-page research paper I’d worked so hard on,” she told me. “Then I got this email saying it had been flagged for inappropriate AI usage. My heart just dropped.”
The irony? She hadn’t used ChatGPT to write the paper. The only thing she mentioned having recently used it for was asking for help understanding a complex topic, flow cytometry, from a set of confusing slides.
“I showed up at my teacher’s office freaking out. I was like, ‘Am I going to get kicked out of school?’ It was honestly terrifying.”
Her teacher explained that an AI detection tool had flagged the paper, but with low confidence. Still, that was enough to trigger an investigation. What ultimately cleared her name? The version history in Google Docs.
“We went through the doc together, and my teacher could see all the edits, the rewording, the sentence changes. She finally said, ‘Okay, I can clearly tell you wrote this.’”
The emotional toll, however, was real.
“It was probably the scariest experience I’ve had in school. I know I didn’t cheat, but suddenly I felt like I was on trial. Ever since, I’ve backed off from using any AI at all.”
Her story reminds us that while AI can be a powerful tool, its presence in education also raises serious questions about fairness, trust, and proof of authorship. It shows just how important it is for educators, parents, and students to have open conversations about how these tools are being used and misused.
1. What term do we think is best to use regarding using ChatGPT in an authorized way in school?
2. Have you or a friend been flagged for having “suspected AI use?
3. What did you think of the student's story and how fearful she felt?
4. What ways are you thinking about using and not using a program like ChatGPT in school?
You can listen to the episode wherever you get your podcasts including these links:
Be sure to subscribe to our YouTube Channel! We add new videos regularly and you'll find over 100 videos covering parenting advice, guidance, podcasts, movie clips and more. Here's our most recent:
Sign up here to receive the weekly Tech Talk Tuesdays newsletter from Screenagers filmmaker Delaney Ruston MD.
We respect your privacy.
Our latest episode of Parenting in the Screen Age, released yesterday, features interviews with college students about how they’re navigating the explosion of AI tools like ChatGPT in their academic lives. I wanted to dive into the ethical lines they’re drawing, what they will and won’t use ChatGPT for.
The rise of AI is undeniably one of the most transformative forces of our time, and its impact on young people’s education is a topic of critical importance.
Speaking personally, if large language models had existed when I was a student, I would have found it incredibly complicated and uncomfortable to decide when it was okay to use them for schoolwork and when it wasn’t. Humans are influenced by incentives, and let’s be honest: there are plenty of incentives to take shortcuts with assignments.
I have deep empathy for students today. This new reality can really mess with their minds as they try to figure out when and how to use these tools, and when not to.
In today’s blog, I’m focusing on just one of the students I interviewed in the Podcast. This college student shared a particularly challenging experience: getting flagged for AI cheating on a paper she had written entirely on her own.
But first…
Many teens turn to AI when struggling emotionally, but few admit it. In a new Jed Foundation survey, 57% of students said they had used AI to cope with hard emotions, yet only 8% said they seek its help. I share three questions to ask your teen, a story from my clinic, and why youth should turn to people, not AI.
READ MORE >
Nearly half of kids have never talked with their parents about AI safety. Our Family AI Agreement is a template to fill out together, covering social life, schoolwork, mental wellness, sleep, fakes, and privacy. The goal isn’t perfect rule-following but ongoing conversations about our WHYs.
READ MORE >
Common Sense Media’s Youth AI Safety Institute tested OpenAI’s new ChatGPT for Teens and rated it an “Unacceptable Risk” for all kids under 18. Parent alerts failed to fire even when teens discussed suicide, self-harm, or disordered eating, crisis support fell short, and it still does kids’ homework. The findings show why we need regulations requiring independent safety testing before these products reach teens.
READ MORE >for more like this, DR. DELANEY RUSTON'S NEW BOOK, PARENTING IN THE SCREEN AGE, IS THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE FOR TODAY’S PARENTS. WITH INSIGHTS ON SCREEN TIME FROM RESEARCHERS, INPUT FROM KIDS & TEENS, THIS BOOK IS PACKED WITH SOLUTIONS FOR HOW TO START AND SUSTAIN PRODUCTIVE FAMILY TALKS ABOUT TECHNOLOGY AND IT’S IMPACT ON OUR MENTAL WELLBEING.
